Drone Laws and Litigation

Published on: | by

Drones—also called unmanned aircraft systems (UAS)—are no longer niche tools limited to hobbyists. Today, drones are used for real estate marketing, construction progress monitoring, private security, agriculture, filmmaking, inspections, and emergency response. As drone usage increases, so do disputes involving privacy, property rights, cybersecurity, regulatory compliance, and personal injury. For individuals and businesses alike, understanding drone laws and how drone litigation works is essential to managing legal risk. This article provides an overview of major U.S. and California drone legal frameworks and highlights the most common litigation scenarios involving drones.

Federal Law: FAA Rules and Airspace Authority

In the United States, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) is the primary regulator of civil drone operations. The FAA’s rules determine where and how drones may fly, and violations can lead to civil penalties, enforcement actions, and operational restrictions. Most commercial drone operations fall under FAA Part 107, which generally requires:

  • A certified remote pilot (Part 107 certificate);
  • Drones weighing less than 55 pounds (unless a waiver applies);
  • Compliance with altitude, speed, and operational restrictions;
  • Airspace authorization when operating in controlled airspace; and
  • Rules addressing operations over people, moving vehicles, or at night (often requiring additional compliance measures, waivers, or specific drone categories).

Even for recreational drone users, federal rules still apply, including requirements tied to safety guidelines and airspace restrictions. Federal authority over navigable airspace is broad, but that does not eliminate state-law exposure when drone operations trigger privacy, trespass, nuisance, or negligence claims.

California Law: Privacy, Harassment, and Local Restrictions

California is one of the most active jurisdictions for drone-related privacy and tort disputes. While the FAA governs airspace safety and flight rules, California law frequently becomes the focal point when drones are used in ways that impact people on the ground.

Key California legal themes include:

  • Privacy intrusions (recording or surveillance of private activities);
  • Harassment and stalking concerns;
  • Nuisance claims based on repeated overflight, noise, or disruption;
  • Trespass-like theories where drone activity interferes with use and enjoyment of property; and
  • Local ordinances regulating takeoff/landing in parks or specific municipal areas (subject to preemption limits).

Litigation strategy typically requires a blended approach because drone cases often combine federal aviation issues with state-law claims – i.e., understanding FAA rules, analyzing state tort liability, and preserving technical evidence.

Common Drone Litigation Scenarios

Drone disputes generally fall into several recurring categories. The facts matter, and outcomes often turn on evidence—flight logs, metadata, operator identity, geo-fencing data, and the nature of the filming or flight path.

1) Privacy and Surveillance Lawsuits

Privacy claims are among the most common types of drone litigation—especially in dense urban areas and high-profile residential communities.

Potential claims may include:

  • Intrusion upon seclusion (a type of invasion of privacy tort), where a drone captures images or video of someone in a setting where they have a reasonable expectation of privacy;
  • Claims tied to recording private areas (such as bedrooms, enclosed yards, or through windows); and/or
  • Disputes involving publication or sharing of drone footage online.

Privacy cases often intensify when footage is posted to social media or used commercially (advertising, influencer content, monetized channels), where damages and injunctive relief become more realistic.

2) Personal Injury and Property Damage Cases

Drone accidents can cause physical injury, property damage, and fire risks. Litigation can arise from:

  • Rotor strikes, crashes into crowds, or battery-related incidents;
  • Dropping payloads (intentionally or accidentally);
  • Damage to vehicles, roofs, windows, or equipment.

These cases typically involve negligence theories and require analysis of:

  • Whether the operator complied with FAA rules and manufacturer instructions;
  • Whether the operator had adequate training or certification; and/or
  • Maintenance and defect issues (potential product liability against manufacturers).

3) Business Disputes and Commercial Interference

Businesses use drones for inspections, mapping, videography, and security monitoring. Disputes can arise between:

  • Vendors and clients (breach of contract, failure to deliver footage, non-compliance with regulations);
  • Competitors (trade secret exposure through aerial filming); and/or
  • Employers and employees (use of drones to monitor workers or job sites).

These cases can involve complex damages, including project delays, reputational harm, loss of business opportunities, and regulatory penalties.

4) Cybersecurity and Data Risks

Drone technology raises cybersecurity concerns that many businesses overlook. Modern drones may collect sensitive data—images, building layouts, critical infrastructure details, location telemetry—and may sync to cloud platforms or mobile devices.

Cyber-related disputes may involve:

  • Unauthorized access to drone feeds or stored footage;
  • Credential compromise of accounts linked to drone platforms;
  • Improper retention or disclosure of collected data; and/or
  • Security failures in drone vendor software, apps, or cloud storage.

For organizations using drones to inspect facilities or monitor security perimeters, cyber hygiene is essential. In litigation, cybersecurity failures can become central to negligence and “reasonable security” arguments, especially when sensitive information is involved.

5) Trespass, Nuisance, and Neighbor Disputes

A frequent drone conflict involves neighbors: repeated low-altitude flights, hovering, noise, or perceived surveillance. Even where airspace is federally regulated, state-law claims may still proceed based on interference with property rights or enjoyment.

Common allegations include:

  • Persistent hovering over private property;
  • Regular flights at low altitude causing noise or distress; and/or
  • Interference with outdoor activities or use of a backyard/pool area.

These disputes often lead to requests for injunctions (court orders to stop certain conduct), not just monetary damages.

Regulatory Investigations and Evidence Preservation

Drone disputes often escalate into regulatory or law enforcement complaints, including reports to the FAA or local authorities. Whether representing a victim, a drone operator, or a business, evidence preservation is critical.

Important evidence may include:

  • Drone flight logs and telemetry data;
  • Remote controller/app data;
  • Photos, videos, and original metadata (EXIF);
  • Communications between parties (texts, emails, platform messages);
  • Witness statements and nearby security camera footage; and/or
  • Any FAA authorizations or waivers.

In addition, early legal intervention frequently makes the difference between a strong case and a speculative one because data can be overwritten quickly or stored across devices/cloud services.

Risk Management: Best Practices for Drone Operators and Businesses

To reduce litigation risk, drone operators and companies should consider:

  • Ensuring FAA compliance and maintaining proper documentation;
  • Establishing privacy-forward policies (what is collected, how it’s stored, who can access it);
  • Avoiding filming in sensitive areas without clear legal justification or consent;
  • Implementing cybersecurity controls for drone accounts, cloud storage, and devices used in operations; and/or
  • Carrying appropriate insurance and updating contracts to allocate risk clearly.

For individuals concerned about drone surveillance, documenting incidents, preserving evidence, and seeking counsel before escalation can improve outcomes—particularly where injunctive relief is needed.

Conclusion

Drone disputes can move quickly and involve multiple legal regimes: federal aviation rules, state privacy laws, tort liability, cybersecurity obligations, and online publication issues. If you are dealing with a drone incident—whether as an operator, a business deploying drones, or a target of drone surveillance—early legal guidance can help you protect your rights, preserve evidence, and manage exposure. We represent clients in internet, technology, cybersecurity, and privacy matters, including complex disputes where emerging technologies intersect with litigation. If you have questions about drone compliance, privacy exposure, or drone-related claims, you should consult with legal counsel to evaluate the options.